SHRI HARIHAR PRATISHTHAN'S

[LINGUISTIC MINORITY TRUST]

GOVINDLAL KANHAIYALAL JOSHI
(NIGHT) COMMERCE COLLEGE, LATUR

(Govt. Approved & Affiliated to S. R. T. M. University, Nanded)

(NAAC Accreditation Grade 'C'), U.G.C. Recognized (2f)

SHRI HARIHAR PRATISHTHAN'S

[LINGUISTIC MINORITY TRUST]

GOVINDLAL KANHAIYALAL JOSHI

(NIGHT) COMMERCE COLLEGE, LATUR

(Govt. Approved & Affiliated to S. R. T. M. University, Nanded)

NAAC Accreditation Grade 'C' & UGC Recognized with (2f)

SHRI HARIHAR PRATISHTHAN’S

[LINGUISTIC MINORITY TRUST]
GOVINDLAL KANHAIYALAL JOSHI
(NIGHT) COMMERCE COLLEGE, LATUR
(Govt. Approved & Affiliated to S. R. T. M. University, Nanded)
(NAAC Accredited Grade ‘C’), U.G.C. Recognized (2f)
SSR Supporting Documents
Criterion – I [Curricular Aspects]
Key Indicator 1.1 – Curricular Planning & Implementation
1.1.1 :: The Institution ensures effective curriculum planning and delivery through a well-planned and documented process including Academic calendar and conduct of continuous internal assessment.
Key Indicator 1.2 – Academic Flexibility
1.2.1 :: Number of Certificate/Value added courses offered and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc. where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years.
1.2.2 :: Percentage of students enrolled in Certificate/ Value added courses and also completed online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM, NPTEL etc.as against the total number of students during the last five years.
Key Indicator 1.3 – Curriculum Enrichment
1.3.1 :: Institution integrates crosscutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment and Sustainability in transacting the Curriculum.
1.3.2 :: Percentage of students undertaking project work/field work/ internships (Data for the latest completed academic year
Key Indicator 1.4 – Feedback System
1.4.1 :: Institution obtains feedback on the academic performance and ambience of the institution from various stakeholders, such as Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni etc. and action taken report on the feedback is made available on institutional website.
Criterion – II [Teaching, Learning & Evaluation]
Key Indicator 2.1 – Student Enrolment & Profile
2.1.1 :: Enrolment Percentage
2.1.2 :: Percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC etc.) as per applicable reservation policy for the first-year admission during the last five years
Key Indicator 2.2 – Student Teacher Ratio
2.2.1 :: Full-Time Teacher Ratio
  • Supporting Document
Key Indicator 2.3 – Teaching – Learning Process
2.3.1 :: Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process.
Key Indicator 2.4 – Teacher Profile & Quality
2.4.1 :: Percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.2 :: Percentage of Full-Time teachers with NET / SET / SLET / Ph. D. / D.Sc. / D.Litt. / L.L.D. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)
Key Indicator 2.5 – Evaluation Process & Reforms
2.5.1 :: Mechanism of internal / external assessment is transparent and the grievance redressal system is time- bound and efficient.
Key Indicator 2.6 – Student Performance & Learning Outcome
2.6.1 :: Programme Outcomes (POs) and Course Outcomes (COs) for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website
2.6.2 :: Attainment of POs and COs are evaluated.
2.6.3 :: Pass percentage of Students during last five years (excluding backlog students)
Key Indicator 2.7 – Student Satisfaction Survey
2.7.1 :: Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.
Criterion – III [Research, Innovations & Extension]
Key Indicator 3.1 – Resource Mobilization for Research
3.1.1 :: Grants received from Government and non-governmental agencies for research projects / endowments in the institution during the last five years
  • Supporting Document
Key Indicator 3.2 – 
3.2.1 :: Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS), including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation center and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of knowledge/technology and the outcomes of the same are evident.
3.2.2 :: Number of workshops/seminars/conferences including programs conducted on Research Methodology, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and entrepreneurship during the last five years.
Key Indicator 3.3 – Research Publication & Awards
3.3.1 :: Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years.
3.3.2 :: Number of books and chapters in edited volumes / books published and papers published in national / international conference proceedings per teacher during last five years
Key Indicator 3.4 – Extension Activities
3.4.1 :: Outcomes of Extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues for their holistic development during the last five years.
3.4.2 :: Awards and recognitions received for extension activities from government / government recognized bodies.
3.4.3 :: Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums including NSS/NCC with involvement of community during the last five years.
  • Supporting Document
Key Indicator 3.5 – Collaboration
3.5.1 :: Number of functional Mou’s / linkages with institutions / industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years
Criterion – IV [Infrastructure & Learning Resources]
Key Indicator 4.1 – Physical Activities
4.1.1 :: The Institution has adequate infrastructure and other facilities.
4.1.2 :: Percentage of expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary during the last five years.
  • Supporting Document
Key Indicator 4.2 – Library as a Learning Resource
4.2.1 :: Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscriptions to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students.
Key Indicator 4.3 – IT Infrastructure
4.3.1 :: Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection.
4.3.2 :: Student – Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year).
Key Indicator 4.4 – Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
4.4.1 :: Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component, during the last five years.
  • Supporting Document
Criterion – V [Student Support & Progression]
Key Indicator 5.1 – Student Support
5.1.1 :: Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years.
5.1.2 :: Following capacity development and skills enhancement activities are organized for improving students’ capability.

5.1.3 :: Percentage of students benefitted by guidance for competitive examinations and career counseling offered by the Institution during the last five years.

5.1.4 :: The institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases.
Key Indicator 5.2 – Student Progression
5.2.1 :: Percentage of placement of outgoing students and students progressing to higher education during the last five years.
5.2.2 :: Percentage of students qualifying in state/national/ international level examinations during the last five years.
Key Indicator 5.3 – Student Participation & Activities
5.3.1 :: Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/ cultural activities at university / state / national / international level during the last five years.
5.3.2 :: Average number of sports and cultural programs in which students of the Institution participated during last five years.
Key Indicator 5.4 – Alumni Engagement
5.4.1 :: There is a registered Alumni Association that contributes significantly to the development of the institution through financial and/or other support services.
Criterion – VI [Governance, Leadership & Management]
Key Indicator 6.1 – Institutional Vision & Leadership
6.1.1 :: The institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with the vision and mission of the Institution, and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, decentralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their short term and long-term Institutional Perspective Plan.
Key Indicator 6.2 – Strategy Development & Deployment
6.2.1 :: The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment, service rules, and procedures, etc.
6.2.2 :: Institution implements e-governance in its operations.
Key Indicator 6.3 – Faculty Empowerment Strategies
6.3.1 :: The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development / progression.
6.3.2 :: Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years.
6.3.3 :: Percentage of teaching and non-teaching staff participating in Faculty development Programmes (FDP), Management Development Programmes (MDPs)professional development /administrative training programs during the last five years.
Key Indicator 6.4 – Financial Management & Resource Mobilization
6.4.1 :: Institution has strategies for mobilization and optimal utilization of resources and funds from various sources (government/ non-government organizations) and it conducts financial audits regularly (internal and external).
  • Supporting Document
Key Indicator 6.5 – Internal Quality Assurance System
6.5.1 :: Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes. It reviews teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals and records the incremental improvement in various activities.
6.5.2 :: Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
Criterion – VII [Institutional Values & Best Practices]
Key Indicator 7.1 – Institutional Values & Social Responsibilities
7.1.1 :: Institution has initiated the Gender Audit and measures for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years.
7.1.2 :: The Institution has facilities and initiatives for
7.1.3 :: Quality audits on environment and energy regularly undertaken by the Institution.
7.1.4 :: Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal socioeconomic diversity and Sensitization of students and employees to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens.
Key Indicator 7.2 – Best Practices
7.2.1 :: Describe two best practices successfully implemented by the Institution as per NAAC format provided in the Manual.
Key Indicator 7.3 – Institutional Distinctiveness
7.3.1 :: Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust within 1000 words.